No.25
>>24Wittgenstein says we should look at how a word is used, we shouldn't look inside of ourselves to find its secret meaning. "Free will" may only mean that we find it prudent to divide different causes and give them different weight in criminal justice, or in personal justice. The good and bad of this can be examined in a public and open way.
No.26
There's another interesting take imo which is about Karma. Karma means action basically despite what I learned in school about Karma as a sort of social credit score. Maybe at some level it is that.
In another more interesting way Karma is the pure action of.. action. Using terms loosely its the moment when cause and effect meet. This is something you can witness because it occurs in the mind. I think you can say that meditation is about watching karma, but it's not technically the right use of the term.
At any rate, if you wanna what kind of choice there is, you can go look at it, and you'll see exactly what it is that makes the world tick. You can track the action and reaction in the mind, and if there's any option in regards to the reaction that's where it should be. We can't talk about it very well because language only tells us the names of things, not what they are. I think that's why we don't have an answer to the question of whether we have free will or not. Because whatever it is we have, we just have.
No.46
>>10>you should fell great, free will is exhausting.Yeah i hate freewill cause if i fuck up i have no one to blame but myself
No.49
you accept it. just like you accepted the time pre-dating your birth and your birth etc…